Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
KIRTI SINGH
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Aarti – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kirti Singh, J.
The present petition has been preferred against judgment dated 27.01.2025 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sonipat, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., whereby maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month was awarded in favour of the respondent.2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 13.07.2016 according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies. A matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondent filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking maintenance. The petitioner filed a reply and contested the claim made by the respondent. The learned Court below vide judgment dated 27.01.2025 granted maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month in favour of the respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sonipat has wrongly allowed the maintenance to the respondent which is on a very higher side and it has been passed totally on the basis of wrong facts. He further submits that the respondent is not entitled for
The court emphasized the need for balancing maintenance amounts to ensure support for dependents while preventing misuse of maintenance provisions.
Interim maintenance is meant to prevent destitution and support dependents effectively during matrimonial disputes.
The court established that maintenance claims under different statutes must be adjusted to prevent overlapping and ensure fair support for dependents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
