SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 365

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ARCHANA PURI
Sumitra – Appellant
Versus
Major Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Archana Puri, J.

1. The appellants-claimants have filed the present appeal thereby questioning the correctness of the amount of compensation, awarded by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, on account of death of Satish, in a motor vehicular accident.

2. Suffice to consider that the accident had taken place on 06.11.2015. On the analysis of the evidence, brought on record, learned Tribunal had concluded about the accident in question, to have taken place, on account of rash and negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.PB-23M-8685, driven by respondent No.1-Major Singh and the same caused fatal injuries to Satish. Thereupon, learned Tribunal, while considering the deceased to be 33 years old and employed as Passenger Services Assistant in Air India and also took into consideration testimony of PW-3 Rahul, Assistant Manager, Air India Sats Airport Services Pvt. Ltd., who proved pay slip Ex.P6, the break-up of the salary, as depicted in the pay slip for the month of October 2015 Ex.P6, is as herein given:-

3. However, learned Tribunal considering the break-up aforesaid relating to over-time, holiday wages and night shift allowances had observed that it was not the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top