IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurvinder Singh Gill, Jasjit Singh Bedi, JJ.
Charanjit Kaur - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRA-D-229-DB-2005
Decided On : 13-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against conviction and sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 21 , 22) |
| 2. details surrounding the incident leading to conviction. (Para 3 , 8 , 12) |
| 3. significant delays raised doubts on witness testimonies. (Para 6 , 24 , 27) |
| 4. court finds significant merit in doubts regarding prosecution. (Para 26 , 32) |
| 5. appeal successfully allows for acquittal of charges against appellant. (Para 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.01.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sangrur.
2. The instant FIR came to be registered on 29.10.2003. The accused-appellant came to be convicted vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.01.2005. The present appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence was filed on 21.03.2005. The matter has come up for final hearing now after more than 21 years of the registration of the FIR.
3. The facts, in brief, are that on 29.10.2003, ASI Sukhkirpal Singh of Police Station, Sunam reached at Civil Hospital, Sangrur on receipt of a memo regarding the death of Bhola Singh son of Ram Singh resident of village Ramgarh Jawandha. Ram Singh, father of the deceased, met him and made a statement Ex.P-11 to the effect that he was a resident of Village Ramgarh Jawandha and had two sons, Bhola Singh (deceased) and Mithu Singh (PW-3). Bhola Singh was married with Charanjit Kaur (accused) about 11 years ago and two sons and a daughter were born from the wedlock. There was a quarrel at the time of the last Rabi crop between Charanjit Kaur, Ram Singh, Bhola Singh and Mithu Singh and a case was registered against them at police station, Sunam. Charanjit Kaur also moved an application before the Women Cell but Panchayats of Villages Kohrian and Ramgarh Jawandha got effected a compromise and Charanjit Kaur came to reside with Bhola Singh about three months back. Bhola Singh was an employee of Atma Singh of Village Kothe Rohi Ram and he resided there on rent in a house of Vas Dev along with his family. The second son of Ram Singh, namely, Mithu Singh also worked at Kothe Rohi Ram.
On 28.10.2003 at about 7.00 p.m., Ram Singh and his son Mithu Singh went to meet Bhola Singh. After taking tea, Bhola Singh asked his wife Charanjit Kaur to bring a bottle of liquor lying in the house for his father and brother. Charanjit Kaur brought a bottle which was half filled, from inside the house and placed it before them. Ram Singh and Mithu Singh did not take the liquor as they were to return to village Ramgarh but Bhola Singh took one peg out of the bottle. When Ram Singh and Mithu Singh decided to go back to their village, Bhola Singh told them that the liquor was tasting bitter. Therefore, Bhola Singh also vomited. Ram Singh arranged a vehicle and removed Bhola Singh to Civil Hospital, Sunam, from where he was referred to Civil Hospital, Sangrur, at about 2.30 a.m. on 29.10.2003, where he expired. It was alleged that Charanjit Kaur had illicit relations with his nephew Satpal Singh @ Baman-accused and Bhola Singh used to restrain Charanjit Kaur. Both Charanjit Kaur and Satpal Singh, conspired and administered some poisonous substance to Bhola Singh in the liquor.
4. ASI Sukhkirpal Singh made his endorsement Ex. P14 on the said statement and sent it to police station, Sunam, and a case was registered vide FIR Ex.P.15. He inspected the dead body and prepared the inquest report Ex.P-4. He moved application Ex.P-2 for post-mortem examination of the dead body. ASI Sukhkirpal Singh went to the spot and prepared a site plan Ex. P-16. The clothes of the deceased were produced before him which were taken into police possession vide memo Ex. P-17. He recorded statements of the witnesses. Thereafter, the investigation was handed over to ASI Sukchain Singh. He arrested accused-Charanjit Kaur on 31.10.2003 and empty bottle Ex.P-29 was recovered in pursuance of the disclosure statement
Ex.P-24 made by her, which was taken
The court found significant evidence gaps and delays in the prosecution's case, casting doubt on the convictions, ultimately leading to an acquittal.
(1) Delay in lodging FIR by itself cannot be regarded as sufficient ground to draw adverse inference against prosecution case, nor could it be treated as fatal to case of prosecution.(2) It would not....
The court upheld the conviction for murder, emphasizing that fear-induced delays in FIR registration and eyewitness testimony were credible despite long lapses in time.
The prosecution must establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt; failure to prove clear connections in poisoning cases led to acquittal.
The conviction based on unreliable partisan witness testimony and a fabricated dying declaration was set aside due to investigative flaws and lack of impartiality.
The court emphasized the prosecution's burden to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the accused due to substantial doubts regarding the credibility of witness testimo....
Failure to prove murder charges led to conviction for abetment of suicide due to mental torture by accused, highlighting the significance of conduct.
Delay in filing an FIR and contradictions in witness statements can undermine the prosecution's case, leading to approval for bail despite serious allegations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.