SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 385

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurvinder Singh Gill, Jasjit Singh Bedi, JJ.
Charanjit Kaur - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRA-D-229-DB-2005
Decided On : 13-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Kashish Sahni, Advocate as Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

The court found significant evidence gaps and delays in the prosecution's case, casting doubt on the convictions, ultimately leading to an acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 120-B - Conviction and appeal - Accused charged with administering poison - Evidence discussed regarding circumstances of death and involvement of accused - Significant delay in FIR registration creates doubt regarding prosecution case. (Paras 6, 22, 29, 32)

(B) The appeal raised substantial doubts about the credibility of witnesses and the timeline of events leading to the deceased's death. (Paras 27, 30)

(C)

Findings of Court:
The appellate court found merit in the arguments for the appellant and set aside the original judgment, concluding that the circumstances were consistent with potential suicide. (Paras 32, 33)

(D)

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence of the appellant set aside.

Table of Content
1. appeal filed against conviction and sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 21 , 22)
2. details surrounding the incident leading to conviction. (Para 3 , 8 , 12)
3. significant delays raised doubts on witness testimonies. (Para 6 , 24 , 27)
4. court finds significant merit in doubts regarding prosecution. (Para 26 , 32)
5. appeal successfully allows for acquittal of charges against appellant. (Para 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT :

Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.

The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.01.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sangrur.

2. The instant FIR came to be registered on 29.10.2003. The accused-appellant came to be convicted vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.01.2005. The present appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence was filed on 21.03.2005. The matter has come up for final hearing now after more than 21 years of the registration of the FIR.

3. The facts, in brief, are that on 29.10.2003, ASI Sukhkirpal Singh of Police Station, Sunam reached at Civil Hospital, Sangrur on receipt of a memo regarding the death of Bhola Singh son of Ram Singh resident of village Ramgarh Jawandha. Ram Singh, father of the deceased, met him and made a statement Ex.P-11 to the effect that he was a resident of Village Ramgarh Jawandha and had two sons, Bhola Singh (deceased) and Mithu Singh (PW-3). Bhola Singh was married with Charanjit Kaur (accused) about 11 years ago and two sons and a daughter were born from the wedlock. There was a quarrel at the time of the last Rabi crop between Charanjit Kaur, Ram Singh, Bhola Singh and Mithu Singh and a case was registered against them at police station, Sunam. Charanjit Kaur also moved an application before the Women Cell but Panchayats of Villages Kohrian and Ramgarh Jawandha got effected a compromise and Charanjit Kaur came to reside with Bhola Singh about three months back. Bhola Singh was an employee of Atma Singh of Village Kothe Rohi Ram and he resided there on rent in a house of Vas Dev along with his family. The second son of Ram Singh, namely, Mithu Singh also worked at Kothe Rohi Ram.

On 28.10.2003 at about 7.00 p.m., Ram Singh and his son Mithu Singh went to meet Bhola Singh. After taking tea, Bhola Singh asked his wife Charanjit Kaur to bring a bottle of liquor lying in the house for his father and brother. Charanjit Kaur brought a bottle which was half filled, from inside the house and placed it before them. Ram Singh and Mithu Singh did not take the liquor as they were to return to village Ramgarh but Bhola Singh took one peg out of the bottle. When Ram Singh and Mithu Singh decided to go back to their village, Bhola Singh told them that the liquor was tasting bitter. Therefore, Bhola Singh also vomited. Ram Singh arranged a vehicle and removed Bhola Singh to Civil Hospital, Sunam, from where he was referred to Civil Hospital, Sangrur, at about 2.30 a.m. on 29.10.2003, where he expired. It was alleged that Charanjit Kaur had illicit relations with his nephew Satpal Singh @ Baman-accused and Bhola Singh used to restrain Charanjit Kaur. Both Charanjit Kaur and Satpal Singh, conspired and administered some poisonous substance to Bhola Singh in the liquor.

4. ASI Sukhkirpal Singh made his endorsement Ex. P14 on the said statement and sent it to police station, Sunam, and a case was registered vide FIR Ex.P.15. He inspected the dead body and prepared the inquest report Ex.P-4. He moved application Ex.P-2 for post-mortem examination of the dead body. ASI Sukhkirpal Singh went to the spot and prepared a site plan Ex. P-16. The clothes of the deceased were produced before him which were taken into police possession vide memo Ex. P-17. He recorded statements of the witnesses. Thereafter, the investigation was handed over to ASI Sukchain Singh. He arrested accused-Charanjit Kaur on 31.10.2003 and empty bottle Ex.P-29 was recovered in pursuance of the disclosure statement

Ex.P-24 made by her, which was taken

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top