Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA
Dilpreet Singh @ Golu – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
27 | 13.02.2022 | Division No.3, District Ludhiana | 307, 323, 341, 148, 149, 120-B, 506 IPC |
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC, seeking regular bail.
2. In paragraph 9 of the bail application and as per para 6 of the status report, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Dated | Offenses | Police Station |
1. | 119 | 29.08.2021 | 279, 338, 304 (2) IPC | Sadar Jagraon |
2. | 193 | 03.10.2022 | 307, 160, 506, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25 /27/54/59 of Arms Act | City Jagraon, Ludhiana |
3. | 19 | 30.01.2023 | 379-B IPC | Sadar Jagraon |
4. | 24 | 15.02.2023 | 379-B, 323 IPC | Sadar Jagraon |
5. | 59 | 16.04.2023 | 379-B, 201 IPC | Sadar Jagraon |
6. | 157 | 28.07.2019 | 61 of Excise Act | City Jagraon |
7. | 04 | 06.01.2022 | 61/78(2)/1/14 of Excise Act | Sadar Jagraon |
8. | 55 | 17.03.2023 | 307, 323, 324, 473, 120-B IPC | Sadar Jagraon |
9. | 27 | 13.02.2023 | 307, 323, 34, 148, 149, 506, 120-B IPC | Division No.3, Ludhiana |
10. | 128 | 07.06.2023 | 25(6), 25(7), 25(8), 54, 59 of Arms Act | City Moga |
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows:
"3. That the brief factual matrix pertaining to the present case are as f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
