SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1922

ANOOP CHITKARA
Hussain Abbas alias Tippu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Rajiv Kumar Saini
For the Respondent: Mr.Rajat Gautam, DAG

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

84

19.04.2022

Sadar Bahadurgarh Distt. Jhajjar

148, 149, 307 IPC (427 IPC added later on) and 25(1B) of Arms Act

1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail.

2. In paragraph 14 of the bail petition, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:

Sr.No.

FIR No.

Date

Offences

Police Station

1

200

08.09.2022

25(1B)A of Arms Act

Sadar Bahadurgarh, Distt. Jhajjar

3. Petitioner's counsel has drawn attention of this court to bail orders of other similarly placed co-accused, passed by this Court in CRM-M-33571-2022 and CRM-M- 43651-2021 on 23.08.2022 (Annexure P3 ) and 30.09.2022 (Annexure P4) respectively. Counsel for petitioner claims bail on the grounds of parity and does not press on merits.

4. State does not dispute the fact that the allegations against the petitioner are not more severe than co accused who was gr

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top