PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Pawan Kumar Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Additional Deputy Commissioner-Cum-Maintenance Tribunal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. statutory provisions regarding eviction under the 2007 act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner may withdraw and refile under new provisions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. directions for future proceedings by the maintenance tribunal. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)
1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order dated 08.02.2023 (Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 22 read with Rule 1 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter to be referred as "the 2007 Act") read with Action Plan framed under Section 22 read with Rule 23 of the Punjab Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Rules, 2012 for vacation of the premises, has been dismissed.2. Learned State Counsel has submitted that in view of the judgment dated23.01.2020 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP=4744=2018 titled as Simrat Randhawa Vs State of Punjab & Others, the eviction petitions filed under Section 22 of the 2007 Act read with the action plan are not being enterta
Smt. S. Vanitha vs. The Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru Urban District & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.