SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Bahl, J.
Sarita Sareen – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate Kapurthala & Anr. – Respondents
CWP No. 14224 of 2022
Decided On : 03-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Mandeep S. Sachdev, Mr. Kunal Muthreja, Mr. Paras Talwar

The Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 has the authority to order eviction to enforce maintenance rights of senior citizens.

Headnote:(A) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 23 - Jurisdiction of Tribunal to order eviction of relatives for maintenance purposes - Supreme Court observed that eviction is an incidence of enforcing the right to maintenance and protection, emphasizing the authority of the Tribunal. (Paras 2, 8)

(B) Judicial discipline - Co-ordinate Bench’s rulings must be respected unless overturned - The Court indicated that orders can be challenged if significant legal principles are missed. (Paras 3, 4)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition filed for quashing a dismissal order by the District Magistrate on eviction sought under the 2007 Act was based on non-maintainability due to a prior judgment restricting eviction powers.

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled to set aside the dismissal order, instructing the authority to reconsider the eviction petition on merits.

Issues: The primary issue was the authority of the Tribunal under the Act to grant eviction orders and the application of precedents in the decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed the Supreme Court’s interpretation that eviction for the sake of maintenance is permissible, therefore the Tribunal has that jurisdiction.

Result: Petition partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed under article 226/227. (Para 1)
2. authority of tribunal under senior citizens act for eviction. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments regarding merits of dismissal. (Para 4 , 6)
4. court upheld authority to order eviction. (Para 5)
5. court's review of authority and previous judgments. (Para 7 , 8)
6. order for re-evaluation of eviction case. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

Judgment

Mr. Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral):- This writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 03.11.2020 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.1 whereby petition filed by the petitioner under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 read with Rules (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 2007’) for ejectment of respondent No.2 from the shop in dispute has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petition filed by the senior citizen has been dismissed solely on the ground that a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had struck down the power of eviction. It is submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case titled as “Smt. S Vanitha Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru Urban District & Ors., reported as 2021(15) SCC 730, had observed that a Tribunal constituted under the Senior Citizens Act, 2007 has the authority to pass an order of eviction, if it is necessary and expedient to ensure the maintenance and protection of the senior citizen or parent and that, the eviction in other words would be an incidence of the enforcement of the right to maintenance and protection. Relevant part of para No.25 of the said judgment is reproduced herein below: -

“xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx

25. The substance of sub-section (2) of Section 23 , as submitted by the Second and Third respondents, is that the Tribunal had the jurisdiction to pass an order directing the eviction of the appellant who is their daughter-in-law. According to the submission, the power to order eviction is implicit in the provision guaranteeing a “right to receive maintenance out of an estate. and the enforcement of that right. In supporting the submission, they have referred to the view which has been taken by several High Courts, indicating that the Tribunal may order the eviction of a child or a relative from the property of a senior citizen, where there has been a breach of the obligation to maintain the senior citizen. The Tribunal under the Senior Citizens Act 2007 may have the authority to order an eviction, if it is necessary and expedient to ensure the maintenance and protection of the senior citizen or parent. Eviction, in other words would be an incident of the enforcement of the right to maintenance and protection.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that this Court in CWP-15170-2023 titled as “Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner-cum-Appellate Tribunal, Jhajjar and others, decided on 20.07.2023, after taking into consideration the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Smt. S. Vatnitha’s case (supra) had upheld an order of eviction passed therein by the authorities under Act of 2007. The relevant portion of the said judgment is as under: -

“9. In the said judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had taken into consideration the legislative scheme of the 2007 Act & reference was also made to Chapter V of the 2007 Act which provide for “protection of life and property of senior citizens”. The objects of the Act which included a need to give more attention to the care & protection of older persons was also taken into consideration. It was observed that the procedure to be followed by the Tribunal was of a summary nature. The contesting claim for both the parties to the effect as to whether the authorities under the Act have the jurisdiction to entertain the proceedings for eviction was also noticed. Relevant part of Paragraph No.6; Paragraphs 15, 16, 17 in their entirety as well as relevant portion of Par

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top