SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 631

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Baldev Dass – Appellant
Versus
Subhash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J. (Oral)

1. The present regular second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant challenging the judgments and decrees dated 12.05.2015 and 04.11.2019 passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court, respectively.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff- appellant herein filed the present suit seeking a decree for declaration to the effect that he is owner of the shop in dispute and that the defendant-respondents have no concern with the ownership rights of the said shop. Further a decree of permanent injunction was also sought. It was the case set up by the plaintiff-appellant that he had purchased the suit property from one Om Parkash vide registered sale deed No.4344 dated 16.03.1989. Om Parkash was the owner of the suit property by virtue of sale deed No.10485 dated 14.08.1986. It was further the case set up that the plaintiff-appellant had raised construction over the purchased property in the year 1989 and given it to the defendant-respondent No.3 on rent @ Rs. 1,400 per month. It was further averred that defendant-respondent No.3 was not paying the rent and defendant-respondents No.1 and 2 are relatives of defenda

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top