SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1281

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Santokh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sukhdev Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondent:Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J. (Oral)

1. The present regular second appeal has been filed by defendants No.1 to 6-appellants challenging the concurrent findings returned by the Trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 30.09.2016 and by the First Appellate Court vide judgment and decree dated 25.10.2021.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 3 herein filed a suit for permanent injunction averring therein that they are owners in possession of the suit property and that the defendants are total strangers to the property in dispute, however, they tried to dispossess the plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 3. On 15.02.2011 the defendants came at the spot in order to dispossess the plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 3 but due to timely intervention of the respectables the plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 3 were able to foil the attempt of the defendants. Hence, the civil suit.

3. Defendants No.1 to 6-appellants and the other defendants (respondents No.4 and 5 herein) filed written statement raising various preliminary objections regarding maintainability and that the plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 3 had neither been in possession of the suit property nor they ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top