Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Guraditta Singh @ Guranditta Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mewa Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)
1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 18.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda, whereby application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the present case, the civil suit was barred by the provisions of Section 158(2) (xviii) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, inasmuch as, the challenge was to the partition proceedings. It is further submitted that the said objection was specifically taken in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and has been perversely dealt with by the trial Court and the impugned order deserves to be set aside and the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC deserves to be allowed and the plaint deserves to be rejected.
3. This Court has heard learned counsel for the petitioners and has perused the paper-book and finds that the impugned order has been rightly passed and the present revision petition, being meritless, deserves to be dismissed for the reasons detailed h
Civil courts lack jurisdiction to challenge partition proceedings by revenue authorities unless a question of title arises or jurisdictional defects are alleged, as prescribed by Section 171 of the H....
The interpretation of Section 117 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 in relation to the timing of filing partition applications and pending questions of title before the Civil Court.
Civil Courts cannot adjudicate matters concerning partition as per H.P. Land Revenue Act, Section 171, which restricts jurisdiction in partition disputes, asserting that remedy lies within revenue au....
The main legal point established is that the Civil Court's jurisdiction is excluded in matters within the jurisdiction of revenue officers as per Section 158 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act.
Civil courts lack jurisdiction over partition proceedings unless fundamental judicial principles are violated; mere erroneous orders do not constitute jurisdictional errors.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
