Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
N.S.SHEKHAWAT
Randhir – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.S.Shekhawat, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') with a prayer to quash the order dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Karnal, respondent No. 2, whereby, the prayer of the petitioner to grant him regular parole was declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide judgment and order dated 23.01.2014, the present petitioner was ordered to be convicted by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, in case FIR No. 297 dated 03.09.2012 registered under Section 302 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sadar Dadri, District Bhiwani and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had filed an appeal, i.e., CRA D-286-DB-2014 titled as "Randhir Vs. State of Haryana", which was also dismissed by this Court on 29.09.2022 and at present, the petitioner is undergoing his sentence in District Jail, Karnal. Learned counsel further contends tha
House repair constitutes 'sufficient cause' for parole under the Good Conduct Act, and specific conditions can be imposed to ensure the safety and security of the victim and her family members during....
The reformative nature of parole and the need for solid reasons to decline temporary release.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
