SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1483

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Punjab State Co-Operative Supply And Marketing Federation Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Ashwani Kumar Garg – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. T.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the Petitioner in CWP-7164-2020 and CWP-85-2022; Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate and Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate, for the Petitioner in CWP-10862-2020; Mr. P.I.P.Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner in CWP-13233-2022 and CWP No.19823 of 2022; Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate, for the Petitioner in CWP-17083-2022; Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate, Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate, for the Petitioner in CWP-15291-2022
For the Respondent:Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab and Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab for Respondent No.1; Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in CWP-17083-2022; Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Raman Kaplish, Advocate and Mr. Lovedev Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in CWP No.10862 of 2020, CWP No.13233 of 2022, CWP No.7164 of 2020 and CWP-85-2022 and CWP-15291-2022.

JUDGMENT :

Jagmohan Bansal, J. (Oral)

By this common order, the above-noted petitions are hereby adjudicated as issues involved and prayer sought in all the petitions are common. For the sake of convenience and with the consent of parties, the facts are borrowed from CWP-85-2022.

2. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting of order dated 28.09.2018 (Annexure P-1) whereby Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short '1972 Act') and order dated 29.10.2020 (Annexure P-3) whereby Appellate Authority have directed the petitioner to pay gratuity alongwith interest.

3. The petitioner is a Public Sector Undertaking and engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of different agriculture products. Respondent No.3 (for short 'employee') joined petitioner on 21.09.1981. He retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2017. During the tenure of his service, he was served multiple charge sheets. In all the charge sheets, there was allegation of misconduct causing loss to the Organization. The petitioner has concluded proceedings with respect to a few charge sheets, however, proceedings wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top