SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 750

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ARCHANA PURI, J.
Kinderpal Kaur And Others - Appellant
Vs.
Jaswinder Singh - Respondent
TA-1154-2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 09-09-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Hasrat Brar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Karan Garg, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Archana Puri, J.

CM-17164-CII-2025

2. The present application has been filed at the behest of the respondent, for placing on record reply to the transfer application, along with Annexures.

3. In view of the averments made in the application, same is allowed and the requisite documents are taken on record.

MAIN CASE

4. The applicant-Kinderpal Kaur and her parents have filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act i.e. GW/44/2023, titled ''Jaswinder Singh Vs. Kinderpal Kaur and others', filed by the respondent, pending in the Family Court, Bathinda and they seek transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Zira, District Ferozepur.

5. In pursuance of notice issued, the respondent made appearance through counsel and filed reply.

6. Counsel for the parties heard.

7. At the very outset, it is submitted by counsel for the applicant that marriage between applicant No.1 and the respondent had taken place on 09.11.2024. One daughter was born from the said wedlock on 18.02.2016, who is in the care and custody of the applicant. However, o n account of the matrimonial dispute, the parties are residing separate. Furthermore, it is submitted that the divorce by mutual consent was obtained by applicant No.1, as well as the respondent, vide judgment and decree dated 16.11.2021, copy whereof is Annexure A-1. One of the term settled was that the respondent shall not seek the custody of the child from applicant No.1 in future. However, the respondent has floated the said term of settlement reached between the parties and filed the petition under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act. Also, it is submitted that the daughter is studying in Government Primary School, Pandori Jattan, Zira, District Ferozepur. Even, the parents of applicant No.1 are 71 and 65 years old and they are having age-related health issues. Even, applicant No.3, mother of applicant No.1, has undergone surgery, for the treatment of 'Chronic Cholecystitis with Cholelithiasis' and the medical report relating to the same is Annexure A-4. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicants, to commute a distance of about 100 kilometres, to defend the guardianship petition, pending at Bathinda.

8. On the other hand, counsel for the respondent, while making reference to the reply, submits that there is concealment of the material facts, at the behest of applicant No.1. In fact, the subject child is residing with her grandparents at Zira, District Ferozepur, whereas applicant No.1 is herself residing at Pandori Jattan, which is far away from Zira. Also further, it is submitted that applicant No.1 is indulging in illegal and immoral activities and she is involved with someone in Patiala. In the given circumstances, the daughter is not being appropriately taken care of, by the aged parents of applicant No.1.

9. In view of the rival submissions aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that the transfer application was filed on 04.09.2023 and at first instance, the application was dealt by the Court on 11.09.2023 and without issuance of notice to the respondent, it was allowed. Vide said order, certain conditions were imposed, thereby giving liberty to the respondent to revive the application, in case he intended to contest the same. Thereupon, an application i.e. CM-10426-CII-2024, was filed by the respondent, thereby seeking revival of the transfer application. Considering the averments made in the application, by detailed order on 07.05.2025, the application was revived and thereupon reply was filed by the respondent.

10. There was matrimonial dispute of applicant No.1 with the respondent and the same was amicably settled between them. On the basis of the same, petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, was filed for seeking divorce by mutual consent and the same was decreed on 16.11.2021, copy whereof is Annexure A-1. Perusal of the same reveals that, at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top