Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ARCHANA PURI
Anju Bala – Appellant
Versus
Mangat Rai Jindal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Archana Puri, J. (Oral)
The applicant/wife/mother has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, i.e. GW/15/2023, titled 'Anju Bala Vs. Mangat Rai Jindal', filed at her instance, pending in the Family Court (Camp Court) Sunam, District Sangrur, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Sangrur.
2. In pursuance of the notice issued, respondent has made appearance through counsel and filed reply.
3. Learned counsel for the parties heard.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 28.01.2012 and from this wedlock, one son, namely, Vahin Jindal was born on 15.09.2014. However, on account of matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate and the custody of the son is with the respondent, since 08.10.2022. While making reference to paragraphs No. 2.3 and 2.4 of the application, the reason for bitterness prevailing between the parties has been pointed out by learned counsel for the applicant. Therein, the applicant asserts about the respondent to be a Gay, as a result whereof, the relations were spoiled between them.
The court prioritizes the convenience of the wife and welfare of the minor child in transfer applications under matrimonial and guardianship laws.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
