SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1513

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Parveen @ Raman - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 48691-2024
Decided On : 18-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.S. Rana, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

216

04.08.2024

Phillaur, District Jalandhar Rural

21-B & 27 A of NDPS Act (Sections 61, 85 of NDPS Act added later on)

1. A mother of three daughters, aged 4, 2, &1, incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, since 4th August 2024 for possessing 12 grams of heroin, just 4.8% of the maximum intermediate quantity, and Rs. 10,000/- termed as drug money by the Police, without any primafacie evidence to such an extent, and to her extreme misfortune, despite all this, denied bail by worthy Special Judge, has come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

2. In paragraph 18 of the bail petition, the accused declares that she has no criminal antecedents.

3. The facts and allegations are taken from the reply filed by the State. On Aug 04, 2024, based on a chance recovery, the Police seized 12 grams of heroin from the petitioner's possession. In addition to the heroin, the police also recovered Rs. 10,000/-from her purse, which the police termed as drug money, and based on such self-declaration, inserted S. 27-A along with S. 21 of the NDPS Act. The Investigator claims to have complied with all the statutory requirements of the NDPS Act, 1985, and CrPC, 1973.4. The petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and contends that further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their family.

5. The State's counsel opposes bail and refers to the reply.

6. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the reply, which read as follows:

3. That FIR No. 216 dated 04.08.2024 U/s 21(B), 27(A) of NDPS Act, 1985 was registered at Police Station: Phillaur, Jalandhar Rural on the basis of a chance recovery of 12 grams of heroin effected by SI Satnam Singh and fellow police officials from the petitioner Parveen @Raman. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

i. On 04.08.2024, SI Satnam Singh along with fellow police officials were going from Phillaur towards Gannapind in connection with patrolling and checking of bad elements. When the police officials reached near Gannapind Village, one lady carrying a polythene bag in her right hand was seen coming out of her house. On seeing the police officials, she suddenly turned towards her house but she was apprehended by police officials.

ii. On enquiry, the apprehended lady disclosed her name as Parveen @ Raman (petitioner). Before conducting search of the polythene bag, an effort was made to join independent witnesses but no one came forward to join the police party.

iii . On searching the polythene bag, a smaller polythene bag was found inside the main bag and from the said smaller bag, heroin was recovered. On weighing the polythene bag along with the heroin on computerized scale, the weight came to be 12 grams. The recovered contraband was put into a plastic box and a parcel was prepared upon which SI Satnam Singh put his seal 'SS'. Furthermore, the petitioner was also carrying a purse from which Rs. 10,000/- drug money was recovered and taken into police possession. Thereafter, form M-29 was prepared. A ruqa was sent to the Police Station through ASI Jai Gurpal and instant case FIR was registered against the petitioner.

7. Dealing in 12 grams of heroin is a punishable offense under the NDPS Act in the following terms:

Substance Name

Heroin/ Chitta/ Smack/ Brown Sugar

Quantity detained

12 Gram

Quantity type

Intermediate

Drug Quantity in % to upper limit of Intermediate

4.80%

Specified as small & Commercial in S.2(viia) & 2(xxiiia) NDPS Act, 1985

Notification No

S.O.1055(E)

dated

11/14/1985

Sr. No

2(xvi)(d)

Common Name (Name of Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substance (International non-proprietary name (INN)

******

Other non-proprietary name

******

Chemical Name

2(xvi)(d) diacetylmorphine, that is, the alkaloid also known as dia-morphine or heroin and its salts; Explanation.-- For the purposes of clauses (v) (vi), (xv)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top