PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Parveen @ Raman - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 48691-2024
Decided On : 18-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
216 | 04.08.2024 | Phillaur, District Jalandhar Rural | 21-B & 27 A of NDPS Act (Sections 61, 85 of NDPS Act added later on) |
1. A mother of three daughters, aged 4, 2, &1, incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, since 4th August 2024 for possessing 12 grams of heroin, just 4.8% of the maximum intermediate quantity, and Rs. 10,000/- termed as drug money by the Police, without any primafacie evidence to such an extent, and to her extreme misfortune, despite all this, denied bail by worthy Special Judge, has come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.
2. In paragraph 18 of the bail petition, the accused declares that she has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts and allegations are taken from the reply filed by the State. On Aug 04, 2024, based on a chance recovery, the Police seized 12 grams of heroin from the petitioner's possession. In addition to the heroin, the police also recovered Rs. 10,000/-from her purse, which the police termed as drug money, and based on such self-declaration, inserted S. 27-A along with S. 21 of the NDPS Act. The Investigator claims to have complied with all the statutory requirements of the NDPS Act, 1985, and CrPC, 1973.4. The petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and contends that further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their family.
5. The State's counsel opposes bail and refers to the reply.
6. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the reply, which read as follows:
3. That FIR No. 216 dated 04.08.2024 U/s 21(B), 27(A) of NDPS Act, 1985 was registered at Police Station: Phillaur, Jalandhar Rural on the basis of a chance recovery of 12 grams of heroin effected by SI Satnam Singh and fellow police officials from the petitioner Parveen @Raman. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
i. On 04.08.2024, SI Satnam Singh along with fellow police officials were going from Phillaur towards Gannapind in connection with patrolling and checking of bad elements. When the police officials reached near Gannapind Village, one lady carrying a polythene bag in her right hand was seen coming out of her house. On seeing the police officials, she suddenly turned towards her house but she was apprehended by police officials.
ii. On enquiry, the apprehended lady disclosed her name as Parveen @ Raman (petitioner). Before conducting search of the polythene bag, an effort was made to join independent witnesses but no one came forward to join the police party.
iii . On searching the polythene bag, a smaller polythene bag was found inside the main bag and from the said smaller bag, heroin was recovered. On weighing the polythene bag along with the heroin on computerized scale, the weight came to be 12 grams. The recovered contraband was put into a plastic box and a parcel was prepared upon which SI Satnam Singh put his seal 'SS'. Furthermore, the petitioner was also carrying a purse from which Rs. 10,000/- drug money was recovered and taken into police possession. Thereafter, form M-29 was prepared. A ruqa was sent to the Police Station through ASI Jai Gurpal and instant case FIR was registered against the petitioner.
7. Dealing in 12 grams of heroin is a punishable offense under the NDPS Act in the following terms:
Substance Name | Heroin/ Chitta/ Smack/ Brown Sugar |
Quantity detained | 12 Gram |
Quantity type | Intermediate |
Drug Quantity in % to upper limit of Intermediate | 4.80% |
Specified as small & Commercial in S.2(viia) & 2(xxiiia) NDPS Act, 1985 | |
Notification No | S.O.1055(E) |
dated | 11/14/1985 |
Sr. No | 2(xvi)(d) |
Common Name (Name of Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substance (International non-proprietary name (INN) | ****** |
Other non-proprietary name | ****** |
Chemical Name | 2(xvi)(d) diacetylmorphine, that is, the alkaloid also known as dia-morphine or heroin and its salts; Explanation.-- For the purposes of clauses (v) (vi), (xv) |
The court held that the restrictions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply to intermediate quantities, allowing bail due to insufficient evidence linking the accused to drug money.
The court determined that the non-commercial quantity of heroin possessed allows for regular bail conditions rather than the strictures of Section 37 NDPS Act.
The court balanced the individual's right to bail with the necessity of a fair trial, emphasizing the need for stringent conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure cooperation with the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the applicability of bail provisions under the NDPS Act depends on the quantity of contraband and the specific circumstances of the case, as i....
The court emphasized the need for judicious consideration of bail applications involving individuals with criminal history and the importance of considering the quantity of contraband in relation to ....
The court ruled that anticipatory bail should not be denied solely based on prior criminal history when the current offense involves a small quantity of drugs, emphasizing the need for judicial discr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.