SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 766

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Pal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Virinder Aggarwal, J.

This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2025, by which the appeal preferred by the respondent/plaintiff was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala. The impugned judgment and decree is contested on the grounds that the suit for specific performance of contract of sale concerning the immovable property is barred by limitation, as the agreement was executed on 19.10.2001 while the suit was instituted much later i.e. on 02.01.2014. The learned Civil Judge had correctly dismissed the suit as time-barred. Additionally, it is contended that at the time of execution, only a mere right in the nature of a 'chance to succeed' as a 'heir apparent' cannot be transferred under the provisions of Section 6 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

2. I have given due and careful consideration to the detailed submissions advanced by the learned counsel and have conducted a thorough and meticulous examination of the entire record before this Court.

3. As regards the scope of second appeal, it is now a settled proposition of law that in Punjab and Haryana, second appeals preferred are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top