SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 813

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Savitri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Daulat Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J.

Present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 10.04.2024 (Annexure P-4) whereby the application filed by the defendant No.6-petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been dismissed.

2. Briefly stated the facts relevant to the present lis are that plaintiff-respondent Nos.1 to 7 herein filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. In the said suit an application was filed by the defendant No.6-petitioner herein under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the same was barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC. Reply was filed to the said application. Vide the impugned order the said application has been dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, present revision petition has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the defendant No.6-petitioner would contend that the suit was clearly barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC as earlier a case had been filed being Civil Suit No.54652-2013 titled 'Savitri Devi vs. Dault Ram etc.' which was dismissed. Further, the appeal was partly allowed and that the defendants had been declared owner of the land on the basis of the sale deed dated 02.07.2009 hence the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top