H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
Prasad Baji – Appellant
Versus
Vijayakumar Ghatage – Respondent
ORDER
The present respondent as plaintiff has instituted a suit against the present petitioners arraying them as defendant Nos.1 and 2 respectively in the Court of learned III Senior Civil Judge, at Vijayapura (henceforth for brevity referred as ‘the trial Court’) in O.S.No.110/2019 for the relief of permanent injunction. The present petitioners as defendants appearing in the matter through their counsel filed an application i.e., I.A.No.II under Order VII Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure (henceforth for brevity referred as ‘CPC’) for rejection of plaint as barred by law. The plaintiff filed his statement of objection to the said application. The trial Court after hearing both sides by its impugned order dated 11.11.2020 dismissed the said I.A.No.II. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants in the trial Court who are the applicants in the said application I.A.No.II have preferred the present revision petition.
2. The respondent is being represented by his learned counsel. Though this matter was listed for admission, however with the consent from both sides, the matter is taken up for its final disposal. Accordingly, heard arguments from both sides.
3. Perused the materials placed
Virgo Industries (Eng.) Private Limited vs. Venturetech Solutions Private Limited
Alka Gupta vs. Narender Kumar Gupta
Jayantilal Chimanlal Patel vs. Vadilal Purushottamdas Patel
Sucha Singh Sodhi (Dead) Through Legal Representatives vs. Baldev Raj Walia and Another
Popat and Kotecha Property vs. State Bank of India Staff Association
Kamala and Others vs. K. T. Eshwara Sa and Others
Bengal Waterproof Limited vs. Bombay Waterproof Manufacturing Company and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.