SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
Prasad Baji – Appellant
Versus
Vijayakumar Ghatage – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Sri Prateek Rath and Sri Mahadev Patil, Advocates
For the Respondent:Sri Mahantesh Patil, Advocate

ORDER

The present respondent as plaintiff has instituted a suit against the present petitioners arraying them as defendant Nos.1 and 2 respectively in the Court of learned III Senior Civil Judge, at Vijayapura (henceforth for brevity referred as ‘the trial Court’) in O.S.No.110/2019 for the relief of permanent injunction. The present petitioners as defendants appearing in the matter through their counsel filed an application i.e., I.A.No.II under Order VII Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure (henceforth for brevity referred as ‘CPC’) for rejection of plaint as barred by law. The plaintiff filed his statement of objection to the said application. The trial Court after hearing both sides by its impugned order dated 11.11.2020 dismissed the said I.A.No.II. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants in the trial Court who are the applicants in the said application I.A.No.II have preferred the present revision petition.

2. The respondent is being represented by his learned counsel. Though this matter was listed for admission, however with the consent from both sides, the matter is taken up for its final disposal. Accordingly, heard arguments from both sides.

3. Perused the materials placed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top