Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Swaran Singh – Appellant
Versus
state of punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
Since all the writ petition(s) involve common questions of facts and law, therefore, they are amenable to be decided through a common order.
2. However, the facts of each of the writ petition(s) are required to be separately delineated.
Facts of CWP-7615-2010
3. The petitioners herein seek the passing of a writ of mandamus for therebys making directions to the respondents to declare that the mixed land use, vis-a-vis the subject lands, which has now been changed by the respondents only for residential/commercial purposes, is illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India.
4. Further, the vires of the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995, has also been challenged, thus on the ground that the same is violative of Articles 243 ZD and 243 ZF of the Constitution of India.
Facts of CWP-14486-2013
5. The petitioner herein prays for the quashing of the impugned order dated 26.06.2013 besides prays for a declaration that the Master Plan, rather is illegal, on the ground that the said has not been approved by the competent authority.
6. The petitioner was running a small scale industry since 1990. In th
The notifications for municipal formation and alteration complied with constitutional mandates and statutory requirements, and the principles of natural justice were not violated.
Regulatory powers of NOIDA cannot arbitrarily deny building permits; valid ownership rights must be respected and decisions must be backed by statutory reasons.
Regulatory authorities cannot arbitrarily deny building permits without valid statutory reasons, especially when ownership rights are undisputed.
The court clarified the provisions related to the sanction of draft development plans under the MRTP Act and the impact of the composition of the Metropolitan Planning Committee on the validity of de....
The respondent authority is the lawful owner of the Final Plot No. 49 and therefore, unauthorized constructions of tin sheet sheds with iron angles and guarders are without any authority of Rules and....
The KIADB is the sole authority for issuing building plan permissions in industrial areas, superseding local bodies like the Grama Panchayat.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
