Back
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Y. Venkatesh, S/O Late Yella Reddy @ Yellappa – Appellant
Versus
Bangalore Urban Zilla Panchayth – Respondent
ORDER :
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
b. Issue any other order, direction or writ deemed fit and proper to this Hon’ble Court from the circumstances of the case.
2. The petitioner claims to be the Proprietor of a Hotel running under the name and style of “M/s.Vishnu Hotel”. The said hotel was constructed in Plot No.256-A1 in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk, which plot was allotted to the petitioner as per an allotment letter dated 21.11.1995 by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘KIADB’ for short).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner/allottee has complied with all the terms and conditions imposed by the KIADB and thereafter, a registered sale deed came to be executed on 25.9.2000.
4. Contending that the KIADB has no jurisdiction since a sale deed has been executed, the petitioner applied to the Bommasandra Grama panchayat for grant of plan sanction for put
The KIADB is the sole authority for issuing building plan permissions in industrial areas, superseding local bodies like the Grama Panchayat.
Point of law: writ petition was not barred by either on the principles of res judicata or constructive res judicata. In the peculiar facts of the case since the issues referred to supra namely issue ....
Point of law : Right of a person to construct residential houses in the residential area is a valuable right. The said right can only be regulated in terms of a regulatory statute but unless there ex....
The original HIDCO plan was the only legally valid sanctioned plan, and the impugned order lacked credible defense and was contrary to legal provisions.
Regulatory powers of NOIDA cannot arbitrarily deny building permits; valid ownership rights must be respected and decisions must be backed by statutory reasons.
Prior development permissions granted under repealed rules remain valid despite subsequent regulatory changes, and cannot be revoked retroactively by new laws.
Regulatory authorities cannot arbitrarily deny building permits without valid statutory reasons, especially when ownership rights are undisputed.
The Court declared the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Amendment Act, 2021 and related demands unconstitutional, emphasizing the illegality of fee linkage to market value and ensuring no double char....
A building plan submitted to a municipal authority is deemed sanctioned only if submitted correctly; failure to provide required particulars negates this status.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
