Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
AMAN CHAUDHARY
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER :
Aman Chaudhary. J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed for directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in terms of the policy dated 07.03.1996 issued by the Government of Haryana on 18.03.1996.
2. Learned counsel would contend that the petitioners were appointed as Beldar on muster roll in the year 1992, however, have not been regularised. Reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in a bunch of petitions allowed on 13.03.2024 titled as Ashish Sharma and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others in CWP-2158-2020, by taking into account submissions of either side and relying on the aforesaid judgment, relevant paras whereof read thus:
xx xx xx
25. Hence, the objections being raised by the respondents-State that the petitioners were not appointed against the regular sanctioned post or, there does not exist any regular post so as to regularize the services of the petitioners, is contrary to their own decision dated 21.12.2018 and cannot be accepted so as to deny the petitioners benefit of regularization of their services from the date services of employees junior to them have been regularized.
26. Even otherwise, once an employee has worked fo
Employees on contract basis are entitled to regularization after eight years of service as per policy, regardless of post availability, and delays in regularization are unjustified.
The court emphasized fair treatment and equal pay, mandating regularization of long-serving employees who were arbitrarily excluded from benefits, thereby reinforcing principles of equality under Art....
Point of Law : Court that practice of the respondent Corporation in not regularizing the service of the workmen even though they have completed eight years of service, amounts to unfair labour practi....
Long-term employees cannot be denied regularization solely due to the absence of formal appointment documents; equitable treatment under Article 14 mandates similar consideration for all similarly si....
Long-term, continuous service in sanctioned posts must be considered for regularisation as per judicial precedents, regardless of procedural irregularities.
Regularization of services for employees who have served for over ten years is a right that must be considered by the state, provided there are no valid objections, and the state must adhere to its o....
An employee's long and continuous service reinforces entitlement to regularization, regardless of initial temporary status, especially when compared to similarly situated colleagues.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
