Vinod Kumar vs State of Haryana - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 514

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 514

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate with Ms. Monika Khatri, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.

This Civil Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 12.03.2004 (Annexure P-3) and also quashing the Impugned order dated 06.03.2017 (P-9) whereby claim of the petitioner has been rejected without considering the Judgment of the high court and the judgment of the Supreme Court and also without considering the judgment dated 19.08.2004 passed by the High Court in CWP No. 1998 of 2003 because the petitioner was similar situated person passed by the Superintending Engineer P.W.D Hisar i.e. respondent no. 3, whereby the services of the petitioner has been regularized w.e.f. 01.10.2003 instead of 01.02.1996 and also quashing the order dated 06.03.2017 (P-9) passed by the respondent no.2 i.e Engineer in Chief Haryana, Public Health Department, Panchkula.

The conspectus of Facts:

2. The petitioner was appointed as Beldar on daily wage/muster roll basis on 01.05.1993. Their work and conduct throughout remained satisfactory and no adverse remark or complaint was ever recorded against them.

3. The State Government of Haryana issued a reg