Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Ravinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been preferred under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter 'Cr.P.C.') seeking quashing of order dated 02.11.2016 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra whereby order dated 17.11.2015 (Annexure P-2) passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra vide which respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 have been discharged in FIR No. 362 registered under Sections 323, 342, 406, 498-A, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Thanesar, Kurukshetra, was upheld.
2. Briefly, the facts are that the marriage between the petitioner-complainant and respondent No.2 was solemnised on 20.11.2011 in accordance with Sikh rites and rituals. The petitioner was 1.5 months pregnant when respondent Nos.2 to 4-accused spiked her juice with some medicine that caused termination of the said pregnancy. Moreover, respondent Nos.2 to 4-accused were constantly harassing the petitioner to bring more dowry. Owing to the same, the parents of the petitioner gave Rs. 1,00,000/- on 25.11.2011. On the same day, respondent Nos.2 to 4-accused started demanding for a bigger car as the petitioner had brought an Alto car
Acts of cruelty and sexual assault may be interconnected, allowing jurisdiction where the victim takes refuge post-marriage, reinforcing that psychological impacts persist beyond the matrimonial home....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to scrutinize vague and omnibus allegations in cases under section 498A IPC, prevent the abuse of the criminal court process, and consider....
The judgment established the importance of specific allegations and cautioned against implicating relatives of the husband without prima facie evidence in cases under Section 498A of the Indian Penal....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the courts at the place where the wife takes shelter after leaving the matrimonial home due to acts of cruelty would have jurisdiction to ente....
Vague and general allegations in matrimonial disputes do not warrant prosecution under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, as they may constitute malicious prosecution.
The court held that proceedings under Section 498A IPC were malicious and lacked evidentiary support, justifying quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Charges framed under Sections 498A and 323 IPC quashed due to lack of specific allegations and evidence, preventing abuse of process of law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
