Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Sharanjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Harjinder Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajbir Sehrawat, J. (Oral)
1. This is regular second appeal filed by the unsuccessful appellant-plaintiff in a suit for damages filed by her for malicious prosecution.
2. The brief facts of this case, as has been delineated from the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court, are that the appellant-plaintiff had filed a suit claiming therein that the appellant was employed as a teacher in government school and she was married with the respondent, who at that time was posted as Constable in Punjab Police. However, their marriage could not go smoothly, therefore, the appellant had initiated certain proceedings against the respondent on matrimonial side. Ultimately, the respondent had filed a petition for divorce from respondent, which was dismissed upto the High Court. Just to harass the appellant further, the respondent registered a false and frivolous case i.e. FIR No.76 dated 21.05.2004 under Sections 420, 467 and 471 IPC against the appellant; for allegedly; fabricating a certificate showing the appellant to be in reserve category of 'Economic Weaker Section'. However ultimately, in the said case, the appellant was acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhia
Acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically imply malicious prosecution; all elements of the claim must be established.
To claim damages for malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove both lack of reasonable cause and that the prosecution was initiated with malice.
To succeed in a suit for malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove the defendant acted without reasonable cause and with malice.
The judgment established that the proof of the four elements required for a tort of malicious prosecution cannot be adduced at the stage of an Order VII Rule 11 CPC application, and highlighted the n....
To establish malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove both a lack of reasonable cause and a favorable termination of the proceedings; mere acquittal does not suffice.
Plaintiffs must demonstrate malicious intent and material damages in malicious prosecution claims, with mere acquittal insufficient for recovery.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
