Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
S. Periyasamy – Appellant
Versus
N.Periyasamy – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This revision is preferred against the fair and decreetal order, dated 15.02.2023 made in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in O.S.No.249 of 2020 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur.
2. The respondent as plaintiff filed the above suit in O.S.No.249 of 2020 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur claiming a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards damages for malicious prosecution. In the plaint it is averred that revision petitioner / defendant has given a false complaint against him on 02.04.2014 and on the basis of the said complaint Velliyanai Police Station, registered a case in Crime No.59 of 2014 for the offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC and the charge sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Karur and the case was taken on file in C.C.No.110 of 2014. Thereafter, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur acquitted the plaintiff by the Judgment, dated 13.12.2019 holding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond the reasonable doubt. The plaintiff has not committed any offence as alleged in the said complaint. Due to the act of the defendant herein, the reputation of the plaintiff's family was affected and the pl
Acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically imply malicious prosecution; all elements of the claim must be established.
To establish malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove both a lack of reasonable cause and a favorable termination of the proceedings; mere acquittal does not suffice.
The judgment established that the proof of the four elements required for a tort of malicious prosecution cannot be adduced at the stage of an Order VII Rule 11 CPC application, and highlighted the n....
To succeed in a suit for malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove the defendant acted without reasonable cause and with malice.
Plaintiffs must demonstrate malicious intent and material damages in malicious prosecution claims, with mere acquittal insufficient for recovery.
In malicious prosecution claims, plaintiffs must prove malice and actual damages; failure to do so results in dismissal of the suit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
