SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1840

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Shivdhan – Appellant
Versus
Manjeet Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Nikhil Mittal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the learned Family Court, Yamuna Nagar, vide which application filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') was allowed and maintenance of Rs.6,000/- per month was awarded to be paid to the respondent.

2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 22.09.1996 according to Hindu/Sikh rites and rituals. Out of this wedlock, no child was born. However, matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondent filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance of Rs.25,000/- per month. The petitioner filed a reply and contested the claim made by the respondent. The learned Family Court vide order dated 28.02.2024 granted maintenance allowance of Rs.6,000/- per month in favour of the respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that provisions of Section 125 Cr.P.C. can only be invoked by a legally wedded wife. The petitioner is Muslim whereas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top