Inderjeet Singh @ Inderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1926

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA
Inderjeet Singh @ Inderjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. T.P.S. Makkar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
0021	21.09.2022	Vigilance Bureau, Ferozepur, District Ferozepur	7 of PC (Amendment) Act, 2018

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail.

2. In paragraph 20 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. Petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and is also voluntarily agreeable to the condition that till the conclusion of the trial before the trial court, the petitioner shall keep only one mobile number, which is mentioned in AADHAR card, and within fifteen days of release from prison undertakes to disconnect all other mobile numbers. The petitioner contends that the further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, he has voluntarily complied with the condition of declaration of assets and has handed over affidavit to the State, as such, there is no need for declaration of assets afresh.

4. State counsel has filed reply dated 13.03.