ANOOP CHITKARA
Vijay Sehrawat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
30 | 18.02.2022 | City Tauru, District Nuh (Mewat) | 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC and Section 61 of Excise Act Haryana 2020 |
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 14 of the bail petition, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1 | 312 | 24.12.2021 | 285, 336, 341 IPC & 25 of Arms Act | Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar |
2 | 105 | 23.02.2022 | 61 of Excise Act | Sadar Tauru, District Nuh (Mewat) |
3. Based on a secret information, the police recovered 580 boxes of liquor from the container of a parked truck and apprehended one Shahid Ali, who during interrogation named the petitioner as the owner of liquor.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
5. While opposing the bail, Ld. counsel representing the State contends that given the criminal past, the accused is likely to indulge in crime once released on bail.
REASONIN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.