PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Gurvinder Singh Gill and Gurbir Singh, JJ.
Balwinder Singh And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-D-11-DB-2018(O&M)
Decided on : 04-04-2024
JUDGMENT :
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.
The appellants Balwinder Singh and Bhola Singh assail judgment and order dated 4.9.2017 passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Bathinda vide which the appellants have been held guilty of having committed offences punishable under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act and have been sentenced as under :-
Offence | Imprisonment | Fine | In default of fine |
under Section 21 of the NDPS Act | R.I. for 11 years | Rs. 1,10,000/- | R.I. of one year R.I. of one year |
under Section 22 of the NDPS Act | R.I. for 11 years | Rs. 1,10,000/- |
2. It is the case of prosecution that on 2.9.2012, a police party headed by ASI Balbir Singh (Investigating Officer) went for patrolling in the area of village Jajjal. One Jagna Singh was also associated with the police party. When the police party was present near the bridge on minor canal in the area of village Jajjal, two persons were seen coming on foot who were carrying a white coloured heavy plastic bag in their hands. Upon noticing the police party, they threw away the plastic bag and tried to slip away in the fields. However, the police party, getting suspicious, apprehended them. Upon inquiry, they disclosed their names as Balwinder Singh and Bhola Singh. It is further the case of prosecution that a transparent envelope could be seen lying inside the bag which had been thrown by the accused and some intoxicant powder and intoxicant vials of Rexcof were visible. Both Balwinder Singh and Bhola Singh were extended an offer in terms of Section 50 of the NDPS Act but both of them stated that they reposed confidence in the Investigating Officer with regard to search of their bag. A sample of 50 grams of intoxicant powder was separated and the remaining intoxicant powder was found to weighing 250 grams. Similarly, one vial of Rexcof was taken as a sample and the remaining were found to be 61 vials. After completing proceedings at the spot, the case property was deposited in the Malkhana. The samples which had been drawn at the spot were sent for analysis to FSL on 12.9.2012 through Head Constable Baldev Singh. As per the report of FSL, the recovered intoxicant powder was found to be containing 'Methamphetamine' and the vial were found to contain 'Codeine'.
3. Upon completion of investigation, challan was presented against the accused on 28.4.2014.
4. The Special Court, Bathinda, initially framed charges for offence punishable under Sections 21 of the NDPS Act on 8.5.2014. However, subsequently amended charges for offences punishable under section 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act were framed on 4.9.2017.
5. The prosecution, in order to substantiate its case, examined as many as 5 prosecution witnesses. PW-1 ASI Balbir Singh (Investigating Officer) stated in detail with regard to the entire investigation conducted by him right from apprehension of the accused on 2.9.2012 upto the presentation of challan. He duly proved all the documents prepared including recovery memo, consent memo, rough site plan etc.
6. PW-2 Head Constable Iqbal Singh, who was also comprised in the police party when the accused had been apprehended, corroborated the prosecution story and broadly stated in tune with the testimony of the PW-1 ASI Balbir Singh (Investigating Officer).
7. PW-3 Head Constable Baldev Singh deposed that on 12.9.2012, ASI Darshan Singh SHO had handed over sample parcels to him for depositing the same in the office of FSL, Mohali which he accordingly deposited the same with FSL. PW-4 ASI Darshan Singh stated that on 2.9.2012, he was working as ASI-cum-officiating SHO and that ASI Balbir Singh produced before him the accused alongwith sample parcels and the bulk parcel of recovered intoxicants duly sealed, upon which he also affixed his seals and that the case property was kept in safe custody. He further deposed that on 12.9.2012, he handed over the sample parcels to Head Constable Baldev Singh for depositing the same in the office of Chemical Examiner, Kharar which was deposited on 13.9.2012. He stated that as long as
Mandatory compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act is imperative in cases of search of the body of the accused, and failure to comply renders the recovery of contraband suspect and the conviction unsus....
The court affirmed that possession of contraband substances establishes statutory presumptions requiring defendants to prove lack of conscious possession under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Sub....
Mandatory compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act is essential for lawful searches; failure to do so renders convictions unsustainable.
Strict compliance with the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly in cases involving the seizure and disposal of contraband, is crucial to establish the integrity of the evidence and the ....
Mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act must be strictly followed; non-compliance leads to invalidation of search and recovery.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.