SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 922

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KSHETARPAL
Panna Lal – Appellant
Versus
Chhinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral)

1. The Executing Court has ordered civil imprisonment to the petitioner on account of his failure to honour the decree for recovery of amount.

2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the judgment debtor submitted before the Executing Court that he is an insolvent and has no means to pay the decretal amount. He relies upon the judgment passed in Jolly George Varghese and another vs. The Bank of Cochin AIR 1980 SC 470.

3. Per contra, the learned counsel representing the respondent submits that the judgment debtor is required to be sent to the civil imprisonment once he owns a property, however, he claims exemption under Section 60(1)(ccc) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. From a reading of the impugned order, it is evident that the Executing Court has not adverted to the aforesaid aspect of the matter. Hence, the same is set aside while directing the Executing Court to pass a fresh order.

4. The revision petition stands allowed.

5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top