Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Radha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Varinder Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. restoration of appeal based on procedural grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims for enhanced compensation due to inadequate assessment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. determination of income and deductions for compensation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. guidance on compensation assessment standards. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. finalizing the enhanced compensation amount and disbursement instructions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
Sudeepti Sharma J. (Oral)
CM-5923-CII-2025
1. The present application has been filed seeking restoration of the main appeal i.e. FAO-1043-2006, which was dismissed for want of prosecution, vide order dated 21.11.2024 passed by this Court.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the main appeal i.e. FAO-1043-2006, is ordered to be restored to its original number and is taken on Board today itself.
FAO-1043-2006 (O&M)
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 11.11.2005 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangrur (for short, 'the Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation, granted to t
The judgment clarifies compensation adjustments due to insufficient assessment of income and deductions under motor vehicle accident claims.
In the absence of documentary evidence, the court may determine a deceased's income through reasonable guesswork guided by minimum wage notifications. Furthermore, compensation for conventional heads....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
