SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1079

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
MANISHA BATRA
Sunny Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Murli Dhar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Manisha Batra, J.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS') seeking quashing of order dated 17.01.2025 (Annexure P-8), passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Malerkotla in Criminal Appeal bearing No. CRA-15-2025, titled as Sunny Goyal vs. Murli Dhar, whereby, while suspending the sentence of the petitioner, as awarded to him in criminal complaint filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short N.I. Act'), the learned first appellate Court had directed him to deposit 20% of the compensation amount as awarded by the learned trial Court within a period of 60 days from the date of passing the order.

2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is not sustainable in the eyes of law as learned appellate Court, while giving such direction, failed to consider the fact that the deposit of 20% of the compensation amount was not absolute requirement for suspension of sentence and this condition was to be imposed in exceptional circumstances. Hence, it is urged that the impugned order passed by the appellate Court is liable to be set asid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top