Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK GUPTA
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurpiar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Gupta, J.
1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, petitioners pray for quashing of order dated 11.08.2012 (Annexure P2) passed by the Court of ld. Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patiala in a Criminal Complaint No.94-T/2010 dated 13.04.2006 titled 'Gurpiar Singh Vs. Prem Singh and others', whereby petitioners have been summoned to face trial for offences punishable under Section 436 read with 511/447/147 read with 149/342/323/120B IPC. Under challenge is also the order dated 23.02.2016 (Annexure P4) passed by ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, whereby revision of the petitioners against the aforesaid order, has been partly allowed, rather than discharging petitioners qua all the offences.2.1 Perusal of the paper-book reveals that complaint (Annexure P1) was filed by Gurpiar Singh (respondent herein) seeking prosecution of as many as 15 accused for committing various offences under Sections 364/366/323/324/325/342/392/395/447/452/506/436/511/425/148/149/34/ 120B IPC. The 15 accused as arrayed in the complaint are in two sets. Ist 6 accused are police officials (not before this court); whereas accused No.7 to 15 are the private individuals, out of
Official misconduct during arrest does not fall within the color of duty, allowing defamation claims without prior sanction under the Delhi Police Act.
At the stage of summoning, the Magistrate is not required to consider the defense version or evaluate the merits of the materials or evidence of the complainant.
A Magistrate can summon individuals not charge-sheeted by police if there is prima facie evidence of their involvement in an alleged offence.
The court emphasized that a complaint filed after significant delay, introducing new allegations, can constitute an abuse of process, especially when prior investigations contradict the claims.
Unexplained delay in lodging the FIR is fatal for the prosecution. The prosecution must establish the place of occurrence and the identity of the accused. Contradictions in the evidence should not di....
The court established that the inquiry under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. requires a limited scrutiny for a prima facie case, and misapplication of this standard constitutes legal error.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
