Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Harish Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
Present petition is preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') seeking issuance of directions to respondents No.l & 2 for taking appropriate steps against respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Badkhal, District Faridabad for interfering in a sub judice matter, arising out of FIR No.369 dated 15.06.2024 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 427 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') (Sections 307 & 212 of IPC were added later), registered at Police Station Suraj Kund, District Faridabad.
CONTENTIONS
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that on 14.06.2024, the accused persons attacked the petitioner, his son and his nephew. The entire incident was recorded in the CCTV camera. The nephew of the petitioner, namely Vivek, sustained a serious head injury in the scuffle. Consequent to the same, FIR (supra) was registered and during the investigation, a Board of two doctors was constituted by the Civil Hospital, Faridabad. The said Board opined that the head injury (injury no.l) sustained by Vivek is dangerous to life, as evidenced by opinion dated 03.07.2024 (Annexure P-3). Sub
Executive Magistrate exceeded jurisdiction by ordering detention under Section 107 of CrPC, violating Article 21. Illegal detention entitled petitioner to compensation.
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining discipline and the requirement to prove prejudice in cases of non-serving of enquiry report, affirming the authority's discretion in disciplinary pr....
The judgment established the principle of judicial restraint and the separation of powers, emphasizing that the judiciary should not overstep its jurisdiction by directing disciplinary action against....
Judicial officers are held to a strict standard of integrity, and misconduct, including attempts to influence judicial proceedings, justifies removal from service after a fair inquiry process.
High Court’s inherent powers under BNSS Section 528 exercisable sparingly post-revision bar to prevent miscarriage of justice; quasi-judicial proceedings before human rights commission protected unde....
The nomination of judges by a Minister, under the Criminal Law (Special Provisions) Act, was declared ultra vires as it undermined the principle of judicial independence and separation of powers with....
Summary proceedings under Section 384 BNSS for courtroom misconduct valid if cognizance before rising of Court; inherent powers not to quash show cause notices where allegations disclose offence prim....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
