Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Ram Sarup @ Sarup @ Ram Swaroop – Appellant
Versus
Jaswinder Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Aggarwal, J.
The instant revision petition is directed against the order dated 18.09.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula vide which the suit filed by respondents No. 1 to 3/plaintiffs under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for short 'the 1963 Act') for restoration of possession was decreed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred as per their original status.
3. There is a famous proverb 'Blood is Thicker Than Water' which essentially means that familial bonds will always be stronger than other relationships. The oldest record of this well-known saying, as per Wikipedia, can be traced back to the 12th Century in the German language where it first appeared in the Medieval German Beast Epic 'Reinhart Fuchs' (English meaning 'Reynard the Fox'). In the good old times, familial bonds were strong. The young members of the family had enormous respect for the elders and the elders too were fair and caring. In most families, property disputes were looked down upon especially when disputes erupted between blood relations and close family members. With time, with the rise in the prices of proper
In a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the focus is solely on possession and dispossession, not on title, and plaintiffs must prove they were in possession within six months prior to f....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that suits for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Act of 1963 must be filed within six months of dispossession, and the title of the par....
In a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, proof of prior possession and unlawful dispossession is sufficient for relief, irrespective of title or partition issues.
The court reaffirmed that in suits under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the focus is solely on possession and unlawful dispossession, not on the title of the property.
Watchman or caretaker's occupation of outhouse does not constitute settled possession of entire property under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; plaintiffs' prior possession proved by repair works entit....
In proceedings under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the court's role is limited to determining dispossession within six months prior to the suit, without delving into ownership issues.
In Section 6 Specific Relief Act suit, plaintiff must prove settled possession on exact dispossession date against specific defence of third-party prior occupation; trial court's perverse ignorance o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
