Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Sewa Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raghbir Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Aggarwal, J. (Oral)
Plaintiff-appellant (Sewa Singh) assails the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Kurukshetra, dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Court of learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Pehowa, vide which the suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff appellant was dismissed.
2. For the sake of convenience and clarity, parties shall be referred to as per their original status.
3. Plaintiff (Sewa Singh) filed a suit for injunction restraining the defendants (Raghbir Singh and Deepak Kumar) from interfering in the peaceful usage of his electricity connection. It was averred in the plaint that the plaintiff is co-owner in land comprised in Khewat No.104, Khatoni No.138, measuring 102 kanal 14 marla, situated within the revenue estate of Jakhwal, Sub-Teshil Ismailbad, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, as per Jamabandi for the year 2014-15 (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property"). It was averred that the defendants were also co-owners in the suit property and the same had not been partitioned. It was averred that the plaintiff had installe
The right to shared resources supersedes claims of exclusive ownership among co-sharers regarding the use of a tubewell electricity connection.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the categorization of the electric motor connection as immovable property under the Registration Act, 1908, and the implications of family settleme....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
