Back
NAMIT KUMAR
Santokh Singh (since deceased) through his LRs – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over ownership of tubewell connection (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. issues framed for consideration (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's suit (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments regarding misinterpretation of evidence (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's findings and considerations (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. final dismissal of the appeal (Para 14 , 15) |
Judgment
Mr. Namit Kumar, J.
This Regular Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2013 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Batala, whereby suit filed by plaintiff-Santokh Singh for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed as well as against the judgment and decree dated 05.03.2015 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Gurdaspur, whereby appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2013, has been dismissed.
2. For convenience sake, reference to parties is being made as per their status in the civil suit. The brief facts of the case are that plaintiff-Santokh Singh filed a suit for declaration that he is actual consumer, holder and owner of tubewell connection bearing No.B-412 of 5BHP installed in khasra No.10R/13/1/1, khew
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
