Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Sumer Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat of Village Daultabad (Kuni) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)
1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 30.01.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Pataudi, vide which the trial Court has declined to grant ad-interim injunction in favour of the petitioner. Challenge is also to the order dated 18.02.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Additional District Judge, Gurugram vide which the said order has been upheld.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent and mandatory injunction against the Gram Panchayat, BDPO Pataudi, SDO, Civil, Collector and State of Haryana on the plea that the plaintiff had built a house in Rect. no.33 of killa no.7 and the Gram Panchayat was proceeding against the petitioner on the basis of demarcation report which was not in accordance with law. It is submitted that the trial Court vide order dated 30.01.2024 did not grant ad-interim relief and thus, the petitioner filed an appeal against the said order which was also dismissed by the Ist Appellate Court vide order dated 18.02.2025. It is subm
Injunctions under the Specific Relief Act cannot be granted if they impede infrastructure projects, especially when the party lacks ownership or lease rights to the property in question.
The court clarified that allowing additional evidence for demarcation in boundary disputes is essential and does not constitute filling up a lacuna, reinforcing the importance of accurate boundary de....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
