PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Gurdaspur Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kirpal Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)
The present review applications have been filed for review of the order dated 12.05.2021 by which the writ petitions filed by the Workmen, were dismissed. Against the said order, the Workmen have already filed LPAs, which are pending.
2. The present review applications have been filed by the Bank on the ground that the findings which have been recorded by the Court while passing the order dated 12.05.2021, are not correct.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the review petitioners submits that in case the record was destroyed by the Workmen, no relief could have been granted to the Workmen by the Tribunal on the ground that the record was not produced so as to draw an adverse inference.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the review-applicant and have gone through the record with her able assistance.
5. It may be noticed that the jurisdiction of the Court in review petition is very limited. In review, the judgment cannot be challenged on the ground that the said judgment is incorrect. The said grievance can only be raised before the appellate forum in appeal and not before the Court deciding the petition. The present review applications ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.