Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANDEEP PANNU
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Reshma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's alleged ownership and occupation of land. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. issues framed by trial court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial court's findings on possession and legality. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal conclusions made by the trial court. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. appellate court's endorsement of trial court's judgments. (Para 19) |
| 6. arguments presented by the state and respondents. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. court's findings on the legitimate scope of ownership. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. conclusion surrounding the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
MANDEEP PANNU, J.
1. Present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the State of Haryana through Collector, Hisar, defendant no. 3/appellant No.1, and the Tehsildar (Sales)- cum-Managing Officer, Hisar, defendant no. 4/appellant no. 2, challenging the concurrent findings of the Courts below whereby the learned Sub Judge First Class, Hisar decreed the suit of the plaintiff–Smt. Reshma (now deceased, represented through her legal representatives)/respondent no. 1 vide judgment and decree dated 11.06.1991, which was further affirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hisar, on 02.03.1994, in the a
Possession continues until lawful dispossession occurs, with title passing to the auction purchaser upon full payment, regardless of sale certificate issuance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that delay and laches in approaching the Court can lead to the dismissal of a writ petition, especially in cases where possession of the land has b....
Ownership rights acquired prior to partition are valid, and the jurisdiction of Civil Courts remains intact if property is not declared evacuee property by the custodian.
Once land has been acquired, it cannot be restored to tenure- holders/persons interested, even if it is not used for the purpose for which it is so acquired. Once possession of land has been taken, i....
In exercise of jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC, concurrent findings of fact cannot be upset by High Court unless findings so recorded are shown to be perverse.
Unregistered deeds do not confer ownership rights, and possession must be established through valid documentation and legal processes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
