Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJA
Rajender – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against additional evidence (Para 3) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural aspects (Para 4) |
| 4. legal standards for admitting additional evidence (Para 5) |
| 5. conclusion and dismissal of application (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
1. By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to the order dated 16.11.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Gohana, Sonipat, whereby an application for leading additional evidence preferred at the instance of the respondent/plaintiff at the rebuttal stage was allowed.
2. Briefly stating, based on an agreement to sell dated 10.12.2013, the respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance against the petitioners-defendants. The suit was filed on 02.01.2016, whereas the written statement was filed on 11.05.2016. Thereafter an amended plaint was filed on 15.07.2017 followed by the filing of amended written statement. Originally the issues were framed on 05.08.2016 and the evidence of respondent/plaintiff later came to be concluded on 02.12.2022. Thereafter the evidence of the petitioners/defendants was closed on 03
Additional evidence at rebuttal must clarify issues, not cover previous omissions; courts must ensure applications are not used to delay proceedings.
Court ruled that additional evidence should not be permitted at rebuttal if it is merely an effort to fill gaps in prior evidence without demonstrated diligence.
The court allowed a petition for additional evidence despite previous adjournments, citing the admissibility of the documents proposed.
The court emphasizes that additional evidence can only be admitted if justified; belated applications to cover previous omissions are generally not permitted unless no objection is raised regarding a....
A plaintiff cannot lead evidence in rebuttal as a matter of right on an issue the onus of which is on a defendant, and must reserve the right to do so when his evidence is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
