Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Ramji – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's conviction and appeal history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for petitioner's premature release. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's critical analysis of authorities' actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. factors to consider for premature release. (Para 11) |
| 5. remand for a fresh decision and imposition of costs. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
1. Petitioner was convicted by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nawanshahar, under section 302 read with section 34 of the IPC and was awarded sentence to undergo Life Imprisonment, in Sessions Case No.66 of 1998, emanating from FIR No.92, dated 16.10.1997, under Sections 302 , 392, 397 of , registered at Police Station Nawanshahar, Punjab. The appeal filed by the Petitioner against his above-mentioned conviction and sentence, before this Court bearing Criminal Appeal No.439-DB of 1999, was dismissed vide Judgment dated 28.08.2008.
2. The present Criminal Writ Petition under articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner for a direction to the respondent – authorities for grant of premature release in view of notification dated 08.07.1991 (Annexure P-3) issued by the Governmen
Authorities must provide clear reasoning in decisions affecting personal liberty to prevent arbitrary action, aligning with established policies for premature release.
Commission of a jail offence is no legal ground to deny premature release to a convict, especially when the person has been punished for such a misconduct.
The court directed that prisoners eligible under state policy for premature release must be evaluated fairly, without undue reliance on singular opinions, safeguarding against arbitrary treatment.
The court mandated the reconsideration of a convict's premature release proposal, emphasizing rehabilitation, age, and new evidence over the initial decision to reject it based on the severity of the....
The exercise of executive power of clemency is a duty vested in the Authority for the welfare of the people, and the case of premature release of a life convict is governed by the policy/guidelines o....
(1) Commutation of life sentence—Concurrence of Central Government for commuting or remitting sentence is mandatory.(2) A statute does not become operative from date on which it is interpreted. It co....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
