Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Kuldeep @ Sonu – Appellant
Versus
Jagdeep – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of appeal delay. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on compensation assessment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. established compensation law principles. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. application of compensation assessment criteria. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. final ruling on compensation enhancement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
CM-13410-CII-2019
1. The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay of 08 days in filing the present appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant acknowledges that there is a delay of 08 days in filing the present appeal and submits that he would not press interest on the enhanced amount for the delayed period of 08 days.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 08 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.
FAO-4053-2019 (O&M)
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 08.02.2019 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, gran
Married sons are entitled to claim compensation as legal representatives under the Motor Vehicles Act, regardless of dependency, following principles established in previous judgments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
