............ vs ............ - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 58

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 58

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEERJA K.KALSON
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.S. Simble
For the Respondent: Jatinder Pal Singh

Table of Content
1. petition for anticipatory bail under the statutory framework of bns. (Para 1)
2. conflicting contentions regarding bail, injury severity, and investigation requirements. (Para 2 , 3)
3. criteria for bail focusing on injury severity and nature of the dispute. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. absence of necessity for custodial interrogation in cases involving simple injuries. (Para 7 , 8)
5. grant of anticipatory bail subject to conditions and statutory safeguards. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

NEERJA K. KALSON , J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.77 dated 07.03.2026, under Sections 74 , 115(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS (Sections 354, 324, 148, 149 IPC), registered at Police Station Civil Lines Batala, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur, wherein the allegations are that the accused in furtherance of their common intention, caused injuries to the complainant and outraged her modesty.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the impugned order passed by the Court below declining anticipatory bail is unsustainable in law. It is submitt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document