IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Gulzari Begum (since deceased) through her LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Liakat Ali Khan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background, procedural history, and initial pleadings regarding inheritance and mutation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions and legal precedents relied upon by both parties. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. scope of second appeal under section 41 of the punjab courts act. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. incompatibility of claiming title simultaneously with adverse possession against a co-sharer. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. absence of limitation period for suits for possession based on inheritance. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. maintainability of a standalone declaratory suit for agricultural land without physical possession relief. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. final order allowing the appeal and setting aside lower court judgments. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.
This is plaintiff’s appeal preferred against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.1989, passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Sangrur, dismissing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 12.02.1985, passed by the Court of Sub Judge Ist Class, Malerkotla, vide which the suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff (Gulzari Begum) was dismissed
Mohinder Singh (died) and Rep. by his Lrs. and Anr. v. Kashmira Singh
Narasamma and others v. A. Krishnappa (Dead) Through Lrs.
Akkamma and others v. Vemavathi and others
Sk. Golam Lalchand v. Nandu Lal Shaw @ Nand Lal Keshri @ Nandu Lal Bayes and others
Hussain Ahmed Choudhury and others v. Habibur Rahman (Dead) Through LRs and others
Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By LRs and others
Gurdev Kaur and others v. Kaki and others
Narayanan Rajendran and another v. Lekshmy Sarojini and others
Ram Saran and another v. Smt. Ganga Devi
Pankajakshi (Dead) through LRs and others v. Chandrika and others
Kirodi (since deceased) through his LR v. Ram Parkash and others
A party cannot simultaneously claim title and adverse possession as they are mutually exclusive. Inheritance-based suits are not subject to limitation. A declaratory suit for agricultural land is mai....
Possession must be open, continuous, and adverse to establish adverse possession; failure to prove this invalidates claims of ownership.
To establish adverse possession, the claimant must specifically plead and prove a hostile assertion of ownership, disclaiming the original title from a particular date, which was not accomplished her....
A claim for ownership based on adverse possession requires stringent adherence to pleading and evidentiary standards; mere long possession without clear assertions fails to establish a right.
Possession must be adverse and hostile to establish adverse possession; mere long-term possession does not equate to legal title without evidentiary support.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.