Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Kamaljit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. By this common order the instant petitions are disposed of since issues involved in the captioned petitions and prayer sought are common. With the consent of parties and for the sake of brevity, facts are borrowed from CWP-18175-2010.
2. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of result dated 08.05.2010 declared by respondents whereby they have not been declared successful in the merit list of B-I Test.
3. The petitioners belong to Punjab Police Force and they had joined service as Constables. The respondents in 2009 conducted written test and parade test of Constables for deputing them to promotional course i.e. Lower School Course. The respondent declared result on 16.02.2009 wherein they were declared successful. Few unsuccessful Constables preferred CWP-2891-2009 and CWP-6935-2009 assailing aforesaid result. This Court vide order dated 27.04.2010 disposed of both the petitions with a direction to respondent to conduct parade test and interview afresh. The respondents conducted parade test and interview as per directions of this Court and declared result on 08.05.2010. The pe
The court affirmed that candidates cannot challenge a selection process after participating without objection, emphasizing the authority of the Director General of Police to issue Standing Orders wit....
Point of Law : candidates cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. Either the candidates should not have participated in the interview and challenged the procedure or they should have challen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
