............ vs ............ - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 100

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEERJA K.KALSON
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mohd. Uzair, Advocate and Ms. Ginny Mahajan, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG

JUDGMENT :

NEERJA K. KALSON , J .

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanita, 2023 seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.338 dated 07.11.2025 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 140(3), 351(3), 308(4) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 84 of JJ Act and 12 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Civil Line, Sonipat, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 07.11.2025. It is further submitted that the mother of the victim, in her own statement given in writing to the hospital authorities, categorically declined the medical examination of her daughter, stating that no untoward incident had occurred with her.

3. Learned counsel further submits that the victim herself, in her statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS, has not supported the allegations and has specifically stated that the petitioner has not committed any wrongact. It is contended that the present case is false and has been instituted with the sole intention of harassing the petitioner and extorting money by the complainant and her family members. It is further submitted that the inv