SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD – Appellant
Versus
LEELA RAM AND OTHERS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

FAO-1714-2018

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 13.10.2017 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short, 'the Tribunal’) in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, on the ground that appellant/insurance company was wrongly held liable to pay the compensation to claimants/respondents as well as quantum of compensation is on higher side.

2. The present cross-objection has been preferred by respondents No.1 and 2/cross-objectors/claimants against the award dated 13.10.2017 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnaul for enhancement of compensation, granted to respondents No.1 and 2/cross-objectors to the tune of Rs.35,77,040/- along with interest @ 7.5 % per annum on account of death of deceased-Rakesh Kumar in a motor vehicular accident, occurred on 13.12.2015.

3. Since the appeal filed by the Insurance Company and the cross- objections filed by the claimant/cross-objector are arising out of the same award dated 15.12.2023 passed by the learned Tribunal, therefore, F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top