IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Prasoon Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.67 dated 09.09.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Fatehabad.
2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioners along with co-accused committed fraud with the complainant and dishonestly retained a sum of Rs.29,80,000/-. Hence, the present FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the alleged transactions pertains to the year 2024 but the FIR in question was registered on 09.09.2025 i.e. after an unexplained delay of more than 01 year, casting serious doubt on the prosecution story. He argued that the complainant has deliberately concealed the material facts that a duly executed franchise/partnership agreement dated 06.02.2024 was entered between him and Taskar Global Pvt. Ltd. governing the rights and obligation of the parties which was signed by the complainant himself after understanding its terms and conditions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.