Rati Ram vs State of Haryana - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 222

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Rati Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Davneet Sangwan
For the Respondent: Vikram Singh

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.10 dated 10.01.2026 registered under Sections 61, 351(2), 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with co-accused, under a pre-planned conspiracy, duped the complainant, on the pretext of securing a job under Kaushal Rojgar. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern or involvement with the alleged fraud. He further argued that the petitioner is neither the beneficiary, nor has received any amount from co-accused out of the defrauded amount. He further submitted that when the complainant came to know that the petitioner was securing a job for his son through co-accused-Suresh, he himself contacted the said co-accused and thus, the petitioner was not a party or mediator between them. He further argued that mere bald allegations are imputed upon the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document